<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shooting Angels with the Panasonic GH3 in Mexico</title>
	<atom:link href="http://filmmakermagazine.com/61709-shooting-angels-with-the-panasonic-gh3-in-mexico/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://filmmakermagazine.com/61709-shooting-angels-with-the-panasonic-gh3-in-mexico/</link>
	<description>The Official Blog of Filmmaker Magazine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 15:17:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: marcin</title>
		<link>http://filmmakermagazine.com/61709-shooting-angels-with-the-panasonic-gh3-in-mexico/comment-page-1/#comment-18250</link>
		<dc:creator>marcin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 00:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmmakermagazine.com/?p=61709#comment-18250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi,

Im looking for most suitable lens for me and reading on the net all suggestion im just lost now which one to pick. I have the gh3 and i want to use it mostly for shooting video clips as well as concerts so low light lens would be ideal. is there something you can suggest? I really would appreciate all comments.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>Im looking for most suitable lens for me and reading on the net all suggestion im just lost now which one to pick. I have the gh3 and i want to use it mostly for shooting video clips as well as concerts so low light lens would be ideal. is there something you can suggest? I really would appreciate all comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carnavalpix</title>
		<link>http://filmmakermagazine.com/61709-shooting-angels-with-the-panasonic-gh3-in-mexico/comment-page-1/#comment-17863</link>
		<dc:creator>Carnavalpix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2013 21:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmmakermagazine.com/?p=61709#comment-17863</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you Joey,

What lens mount adapter did you buy to use Nikkor lenses with your GH3?

Thank you!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Joey,</p>
<p>What lens mount adapter did you buy to use Nikkor lenses with your GH3?</p>
<p>Thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://filmmakermagazine.com/61709-shooting-angels-with-the-panasonic-gh3-in-mexico/comment-page-1/#comment-17687</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 20:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmmakermagazine.com/?p=61709#comment-17687</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[thanks very much for the review.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks very much for the review.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Panasonic GH3 Camera &#38; Lenses &#124; 2013 Mother Lode for Media Production MA</title>
		<link>http://filmmakermagazine.com/61709-shooting-angels-with-the-panasonic-gh3-in-mexico/comment-page-1/#comment-17501</link>
		<dc:creator>Panasonic GH3 Camera &#38; Lenses &#124; 2013 Mother Lode for Media Production MA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 16:04:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmmakermagazine.com/?p=61709#comment-17501</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] The new Panasonic GH3 mirror less DSLR is already getting very good reviews from independent filmmakers. It has upgraded the data rates and file types created to above levels required by professional broadcasters. With lense adapters it is also possible to use old prime lenses or Nikon or Canon lenses on the Panasonic body. A decent review by a documentary maker can be found at : http://filmmakermagazine.com/61709-shooting-angels-with-the-panasonic-gh3-in-mexico/ [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The new Panasonic GH3 mirror less DSLR is already getting very good reviews from independent filmmakers. It has upgraded the data rates and file types created to above levels required by professional broadcasters. With lense adapters it is also possible to use old prime lenses or Nikon or Canon lenses on the Panasonic body. A decent review by a documentary maker can be found at : <a href="http://filmmakermagazine.com/61709-shooting-angels-with-the-panasonic-gh3-in-mexico/" rel="nofollow">http://filmmakermagazine.com/61709-shooting-angels-with-the-panasonic-gh3-in-mexico/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A user experience video review on Panasonic GH3 - Blog for micro four third and competing cameras</title>
		<link>http://filmmakermagazine.com/61709-shooting-angels-with-the-panasonic-gh3-in-mexico/comment-page-1/#comment-17491</link>
		<dc:creator>A user experience video review on Panasonic GH3 - Blog for micro four third and competing cameras</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 04:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmmakermagazine.com/?p=61709#comment-17491</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Source: http://filmmakermagazine.com/61709-shooting-angels-with-the-panasonic-gh3-in-mexico/ [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Source: <a href="http://filmmakermagazine.com/61709-shooting-angels-with-the-panasonic-gh3-in-mexico/" rel="nofollow">http://filmmakermagazine.com/61709-shooting-angels-with-the-panasonic-gh3-in-mexico/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Mackenzie-Hill</title>
		<link>http://filmmakermagazine.com/61709-shooting-angels-with-the-panasonic-gh3-in-mexico/comment-page-1/#comment-17486</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Mackenzie-Hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2013 15:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmmakermagazine.com/?p=61709#comment-17486</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you.This is by far the most useful real world review I have read so far . Really enjoyed the documentary Angles at war]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you.This is by far the most useful real world review I have read so far . Really enjoyed the documentary Angles at war</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leif</title>
		<link>http://filmmakermagazine.com/61709-shooting-angels-with-the-panasonic-gh3-in-mexico/comment-page-1/#comment-17485</link>
		<dc:creator>Leif</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2013 14:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmmakermagazine.com/?p=61709#comment-17485</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are also fantastic primes for m43 like the ones from Olympus, Voigtlanderz and SLR Magic.

The EVF really seems to be a little downside of the camera. The last days I&#039;ve read many discussions about it and most liked the one of the GH2 more. There also seem to be some kind of sharpness issues with some of them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are also fantastic primes for m43 like the ones from Olympus, Voigtlanderz and SLR Magic.</p>
<p>The EVF really seems to be a little downside of the camera. The last days I&#8217;ve read many discussions about it and most liked the one of the GH2 more. There also seem to be some kind of sharpness issues with some of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: malch</title>
		<link>http://filmmakermagazine.com/61709-shooting-angels-with-the-panasonic-gh3-in-mexico/comment-page-1/#comment-17447</link>
		<dc:creator>malch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 16:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmmakermagazine.com/?p=61709#comment-17447</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Joey, thanks very much for the review.  May I ask:  are you curious about the Voigtlander wide-angle lens?  The 17.5 mm is f/0.95.  I think I recall Phillip Bloom giving it (or maybe it was the Voigtlander 25mm version) a very good review a while ago.
Regards, Malcolm]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joey, thanks very much for the review.  May I ask:  are you curious about the Voigtlander wide-angle lens?  The 17.5 mm is f/0.95.  I think I recall Phillip Bloom giving it (or maybe it was the Voigtlander 25mm version) a very good review a while ago.<br />
Regards, Malcolm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
