<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: House of Cards, the Netflix Algorithms and Me</title>
	<atom:link href="http://filmmakermagazine.com/64544-house-of-cards-the-netflix-algorithms-and-me/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://filmmakermagazine.com/64544-house-of-cards-the-netflix-algorithms-and-me/</link>
	<description>The Official Blog of Filmmaker Magazine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 04:23:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bombast #79 &#124; SUNDANCE NOW</title>
		<link>http://filmmakermagazine.com/64544-house-of-cards-the-netflix-algorithms-and-me/comment-page-1/#comment-17593</link>
		<dc:creator>Bombast #79 &#124; SUNDANCE NOW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 16:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmmakermagazine.com/?p=64544#comment-17593</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] was by Andrew Leonard in Salon.com, dated February 1st; the second, posted two days later, was by Scott Macauley in Filmmaker magazine; the third, from the day after that, was by Matt Singer at Indiewire. Both of the latter show good [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] was by Andrew Leonard in Salon.com, dated February 1st; the second, posted two days later, was by Scott Macauley in Filmmaker magazine; the third, from the day after that, was by Matt Singer at Indiewire. Both of the latter show good [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Macaulay Assays &#8220;&#8216;House Of Cards,&#8217; The Netflix Algorithms And Me&#8221; &#171; Movie City News</title>
		<link>http://filmmakermagazine.com/64544-house-of-cards-the-netflix-algorithms-and-me/comment-page-1/#comment-17542</link>
		<dc:creator>Macaulay Assays &#8220;&#8216;House Of Cards,&#8217; The Netflix Algorithms And Me&#8221; &#171; Movie City News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 00:44:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmmakermagazine.com/?p=64544#comment-17542</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Macaulay Assays &#8220;&#8216;House Of Cards,&#8217; The Netflix Algorithms And Me&#8221; [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Macaulay Assays &#8220;&#8216;House Of Cards,&#8217; The Netflix Algorithms And Me&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Quinn</title>
		<link>http://filmmakermagazine.com/64544-house-of-cards-the-netflix-algorithms-and-me/comment-page-1/#comment-17538</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Quinn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2013 18:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmmakermagazine.com/?p=64544#comment-17538</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We watched the first two last night and felt similarly.  There is a detached quality to the show with no real stakes or complexity to the characters.  I could hear every writing teacher I&#039;ve ever had asking WHERE IS THE CONFLICT?    It is like they plucked characters from Mad Men, The West Wing, and Sorpanos and sucked the duality and subtlety out.    As for the direct address.... yikes.  At least say something clever.    Maybe they are mining the wrong data and forgot that, perhaps, people like well-written shows with stakes that take archetypes and show them something new.   Perhaps the searchable brand names are secondary.   If only this worked in my favor and huge numbers of people who loved Cheers, The Turin Horse, and Top Gun also watched The New Year Parade.  Then, I could direct a slow, contemplative TV series where Woody Harrelson is an ex-fighter pilot who now sits alone in a bar, steadying himself before facing the cold wind outside and hollow ache of death within him.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We watched the first two last night and felt similarly.  There is a detached quality to the show with no real stakes or complexity to the characters.  I could hear every writing teacher I&#8217;ve ever had asking WHERE IS THE CONFLICT?    It is like they plucked characters from Mad Men, The West Wing, and Sorpanos and sucked the duality and subtlety out.    As for the direct address&#8230;. yikes.  At least say something clever.    Maybe they are mining the wrong data and forgot that, perhaps, people like well-written shows with stakes that take archetypes and show them something new.   Perhaps the searchable brand names are secondary.   If only this worked in my favor and huge numbers of people who loved Cheers, The Turin Horse, and Top Gun also watched The New Year Parade.  Then, I could direct a slow, contemplative TV series where Woody Harrelson is an ex-fighter pilot who now sits alone in a bar, steadying himself before facing the cold wind outside and hollow ache of death within him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Harris</title>
		<link>http://filmmakermagazine.com/64544-house-of-cards-the-netflix-algorithms-and-me/comment-page-1/#comment-17537</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Harris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2013 18:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmmakermagazine.com/?p=64544#comment-17537</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bad shows are bad shows, but producers using data to craft shows to their markets is about as old as entertainment itself. Netflix is simply leveraging the medium to do it a little differently.

I am more curious to see how their gamble to release whole seasons at once pays off. Again, this is catering to their audience. And I am very curious to see how this unlocks the form. You&#039;re no longer tied to an hour, half hour, whatever the conventions are defined strictly by advertising. Many shows that do not have ads still stick to these conventions for no real reason other than that they are familiar to viewers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bad shows are bad shows, but producers using data to craft shows to their markets is about as old as entertainment itself. Netflix is simply leveraging the medium to do it a little differently.</p>
<p>I am more curious to see how their gamble to release whole seasons at once pays off. Again, this is catering to their audience. And I am very curious to see how this unlocks the form. You&#8217;re no longer tied to an hour, half hour, whatever the conventions are defined strictly by advertising. Many shows that do not have ads still stick to these conventions for no real reason other than that they are familiar to viewers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
