<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canon C100 Does 4:2:2 with the Ninja Video Recorder</title>
	<atom:link href="http://filmmakermagazine.com/64918-canon-c100-does-422-with-the-ninja-video-recorder/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://filmmakermagazine.com/64918-canon-c100-does-422-with-the-ninja-video-recorder/</link>
	<description>The Official Blog of Filmmaker Magazine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 00:22:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tezza</title>
		<link>http://filmmakermagazine.com/64918-canon-c100-does-422-with-the-ninja-video-recorder/comment-page-1/#comment-18429</link>
		<dc:creator>Tezza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 20:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmmakermagazine.com/?p=64918#comment-18429</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What adapter are you using to mount the Ninja 2 to the top of the handle?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What adapter are you using to mount the Ninja 2 to the top of the handle?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Federico</title>
		<link>http://filmmakermagazine.com/64918-canon-c100-does-422-with-the-ninja-video-recorder/comment-page-1/#comment-18224</link>
		<dc:creator>Federico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 09:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmmakermagazine.com/?p=64918#comment-18224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have C100 (Love..!) with Ninja 1 (not Ninja 2!!). You think the quality is the same of ninja 2? I work like this: Ninka 1 connected with HDMI to C100. C100 in 24p, Ninja detect 1080i 59,94.    Start rec from Ninja (not C100), Stop rec. After in compressor Pulldown Removal (from 29,xx to 23,xx). I don &#039;t have much money to buy Ninja 2... i hope i can work ok with Ninja 1....
kind Regards 
Federico (Turin)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have C100 (Love..!) with Ninja 1 (not Ninja 2!!). You think the quality is the same of ninja 2? I work like this: Ninka 1 connected with HDMI to C100. C100 in 24p, Ninja detect 1080i 59,94.    Start rec from Ninja (not C100), Stop rec. After in compressor Pulldown Removal (from 29,xx to 23,xx). I don &#8216;t have much money to buy Ninja 2&#8230; i hope i can work ok with Ninja 1&#8230;.<br />
kind Regards<br />
Federico (Turin)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://filmmakermagazine.com/64918-canon-c100-does-422-with-the-ninja-video-recorder/comment-page-1/#comment-18076</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2013 13:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmmakermagazine.com/?p=64918#comment-18076</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You need to look at the wall, the speakers, the expanse of color in the background, and at full resolution. The differences are significant.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You need to look at the wall, the speakers, the expanse of color in the background, and at full resolution. The differences are significant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Enrico Parenti</title>
		<link>http://filmmakermagazine.com/64918-canon-c100-does-422-with-the-ninja-video-recorder/comment-page-1/#comment-17627</link>
		<dc:creator>Enrico Parenti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 10:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmmakermagazine.com/?p=64918#comment-17627</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I also think the focus is different, I&#039;ve checked all the tests out there and the difference is really minimal, almost unnoticeable.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also think the focus is different, I&#8217;ve checked all the tests out there and the difference is really minimal, almost unnoticeable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy G</title>
		<link>http://filmmakermagazine.com/64918-canon-c100-does-422-with-the-ninja-video-recorder/comment-page-1/#comment-17606</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 01:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmmakermagazine.com/?p=64918#comment-17606</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is hard to tell much from these examples. The tissue box looks nicer in the Ninja Image, but isn&#039;t the focus different between them? I can&#039;t see any difference in the last example of the papers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is hard to tell much from these examples. The tissue box looks nicer in the Ninja Image, but isn&#8217;t the focus different between them? I can&#8217;t see any difference in the last example of the papers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: We Move Pictures &#124; technology through the lens of video professionals</title>
		<link>http://filmmakermagazine.com/64918-canon-c100-does-422-with-the-ninja-video-recorder/comment-page-1/#comment-17592</link>
		<dc:creator>We Move Pictures &#124; technology through the lens of video professionals</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 16:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmmakermagazine.com/?p=64918#comment-17592</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Read the article at Filmmaker Magazine. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read the article at Filmmaker Magazine. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
