Back to selection

“Living in a Culture of Heroin Production”: DP Matt Porwoll on The Trade

Expanding on the subject of his first feature, the both-sides-of-the-border drug wars documentary Cartel Land, director Matthew Heineman’s latest project is a five-part documentary series for Showtime. The first two hours premiered at Sundance. Prior to the screening, DP Matt Porwoll explained the difficulties of working on a project following both drug cartels in Mexico and stories of addiction and counter-law enforcement in the States in multiple cities.

Filmmaker: How and why did you wind up being the cinematographer of your film? What were the factors and attributes that led to your being hired for this job?

Porwoll: When Matthew Heineman first mentioned The Trade to me, he really wanted to keep the look and feel consistent to what we did on Cartel Land. That meant we needed to bring back as many people as possible from the previous team. We had the same editors, colorist, post sound mixer, and field producers, as well as myself as series DP. Because of the scale of this project, we also brought in some new faces to the team who seamlessly fit into the style of the project.

Filmmaker: What were your artistic goals on this film, and how did you realize them? How did you want your cinematography to enhance the film’s storytelling and treatment of its characters?

Porwoll: With The Trade, we didn’t want to take the typical approach to films about heroin that mainly focus on the drug use itself, but rather take a deep dive into the lives of those most intimately involved. We wanted the audience to see life through the eyes of our subjects to better understand the complexity of struggling with addiction, dealing with the challenges in law enforcement and living in a culture of heroin production. This approach requires a lot of time and energy building relationships with our subjects to appropriately tell their stories. We needed the style to be real, yet cinematic, so as to better inform the emotional journey of our subjects.

Filmmaker: Were there any specific influences on your cinematography, whether they be other films, or visual art, of photography, or something else?

Porwoll: I come from a background in traditional verite filmmaking, so the work of the Maysles brothers, D.A. Pennebaker and others have always inspired me. Matthew and I also felt the work we had done on Cartel Land informed the approach we wanted to take with this project.

Filmmaker: What were the biggest challenges posed by production to those goals?

Porwoll: This approach to storytelling requires a deep trust and respect between the subject and filmmaker. To achieve this, we needed to keep the crews small and consistent. Each team consisted entirely of a producer and a cinematographer, who also did their own sound. Everyone on the project was dedicated to their storyline line 100% through the entire production process. This posed many challenges, such as limited support in the field, managing camera and sound simultaneously and being emotionally drained from the oftentimes tough scenes we were a part of. But without these challenges, we wouldn’t have been able to achieve the story we were after. I am forever grateful for the teams that gave it their all on this project — my fellow cinematographers Max Preiss, Ross McDonnell and Peter Hutchens, our producers Damon Tabor, Myles Estey and Brent Kunkle, and incredible showrunner Pagan Harleman.

Filmmaker: What camera did you shoot on? Why did you choose the camera that you did? What lenses did you use?

Porwoll: We shot on the Canon C300 MarkII with EF lenses. We needed a camera that was small, good in low light, had high dynamic range and capable of recording good quality audio. To me, there was no better choice than this setup.

Filmmaker: Describe your approach to lighting.

Porwoll: The approach to lighting was entirely natural. We never wanted to augment the space with lights. This is why we chose a camera to give us maximum flexibility in a wide range of shooting conditions. Each team carried a Litepanels Astra Bi-Color that was used for our interviews.

Filmmaker: What was the most difficult scene to realize and why? And how did you do it?

Porwoll: There were many challenging scenes in this project for all three storylines. For Damon Tabor and I, the most difficult scenes to shoot were when our subjects were actively using heroin. These scenes are intensely raw, emotional and intimate, making our presence and choices in shooting position quite sensitive. We had to be respectful of the process to show the experience from their perspective while also separating our own emotions from the moment. This is where our relationship with our subjects allowed us the trust required to achieve these scenes.

Filmmaker: Finally, describe the finishing of the film. How much of your look was “baked in” versus realized in the DI?

Porwoll: We shot all of our footage in Canon Log3 and exposed off of the camera’s internal Rec709 LUT. Seth Ricart at RCO did the color grading of the series. We decided to create a unified look to all three storylines to add cohesiveness to the intertwining stories.

TECH BOX

Camera: Canon C300 MarkII

Lenses: Canon EF-S 17-55mm f2.8, Canon EF-L 24-105mm f4, Canon EF-L 70-200mm f2.8, Canon EF-L 24mm f1.4

Lighting: available light/Litepanels Astra Bi-Color

Processing: Digital

Color Grading: DaVinci Resolve @ RCO Post

© 2018 Filmmaker Magazine
All Rights Reserved
A Publication of IPF