“Either There is a Film or There is None. We Chose the Former”: Director Kirill Mikhanovsky | Give Me Liberty
Whenever directors watch their own films, they always do so with the knowledge that there are moments that occurred during their production — whether that’s in the financing and development or shooting or post — that required incredible ingenuity, skill, planning or just plain luck, but whose difficulty is invisible to most spectators. These are the moments directors are often the most proud of, and that pride comes with the knowledge that no one on the outside could ever properly appreciate what went into them.
So, we ask: “What hidden part of your film are you most privately proud of and why?”
In October of 2017, two months out from the start of production, our then-partners left the project my writing and producing partner Alice Austen and I had created and been working on for 2+ years. High and dry, with little to no prospects of making it on our own within any feasible time frame, we could do nothing but face the fact that we still had to make the film—and soon too, or we would, in fact, be, as someone put it, “prehistorically screwed.” To be or not to be. Give me liberty or give me death… Three months later, under-prepped, under-crewed, with a fraction of the budget, the original number of locations and cast members unchanged and vision uncompromised, we found ourselves building the car we were racing, i.e. shooting Give Me Liberty at a breakneck speed while looking for additional funding to complete the shoot. The audience and Nature, alike, have no interest in the blood, sweat, and tears, the whips and scorns of time that befell us. Either you are or you are not. Either there is a film or there is none. We chose the former. There is a film now. There is Give Me Liberty.